Home > CAPEC List > CAPEC-105: HTTP Request Splitting (Version 2.11)  

CAPEC-105: HTTP Request Splitting

HTTP Request Splitting
Definition in a New Window Definition in a New Window
Attack Pattern ID: 105
Abstraction: Standard
Status: Draft
Completeness: Complete
Presentation Filter:
+ Summary

HTTP Request Splitting (also known as HTTP Request Smuggling) is an attack pattern where an attacker attempts to insert additional HTTP requests in the body of the original (enveloping) HTTP request in such a way that the browser interprets it as one request but the web server interprets it as two.

There are several ways to perform HTTP request splitting attacks. One way is to include double Content-Length headers in the request to exploit the fact that the devices parsing the request may each use a different header. Another way is to submit an HTTP request with a "Transfer Encoding: chunked" in the request header set with setRequestHeader to allow a payload in the HTTP Request that can be considered as another HTTP Request by a subsequent parsing entity. A third way is to use the "Double CR in an HTTP header" technique. There are also a few less general techniques targeting specific parsing vulnerabilities in certain web servers.

+ Attack Steps
  1. Investigate Target Environment: Determine the technologies used in the target environment such as types of browsers, web servers, application firewalls, proxies, etc.

    Investigation of the target environment to determine the types of technologies used to parse the incoming HTTP requests. Attempt to understand how HTTP Request headers are parsed

  1. Post a malicious HTTP Request: Post a malicious HTTP request that will be interpreted as multiple HTTP requests when parsed on the server

    Post a malicious HTTP Request utilizing double CR/LF characters in HTTP header to cause request splitting

    Post a malicious HTTP Request utilizing "Transfer Encoding: chunked" in the request header to cause request splitting

    Post a malicious HTTP Request utilizing double Content-Length headers to cause request splitting

+ Attack Prerequisites
  • User-manipulateable HTTP Request headers are processed by the web server

+ Typical Severity


+ Typical Likelihood of Exploit

Likelihood: Medium

+ Methods of Attack
  • Protocol Manipulation
  • Injection
  • Analysis
+ Examples-Instances


Microsoft Internet Explorer versions 5.01 SP4 and prior, 6.0 SP2 and prior, and 7.0 contain a vulnerability that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct HTTP request splitting and smuggling attacks.

The vulnerability is due to an input validation error in the browser that allows attackers to manipulate certain headers to expose the browser to HTTP request splitting and smuggling attacks. Attacks may include cross-site scripting, proxy cache poisoning, and session fixation. In certain instances, an exploit could allow the attacker to bypass web application firewalls or other filtering devices.

Microsoft has confirmed the vulnerability and released software updates

+ Attacker Skills or Knowledge Required

Skill or Knowledge Level: Medium

Good understanding of the HTTP protocol and the parsing mechanisms employed by various web servers

+ Resources Required

A tool that allows for the sending of customized HTTP requests is required.

+ Probing Techniques

Issue HTTP Requests against a target server and examine responses.

+ Solutions and Mitigations

Make sure to install the latest vendor security patches available for the web server.

If possible, make use of SSL.

Install a web application firewall that has been secured against HTTP Request Splitting

Use web servers that employ a tight HTTP parsing process

+ Attack Motivation-Consequences
ScopeTechnical ImpactNote
Execute unauthorized code or commands
Run Arbitrary Code
Gain privileges / assume identity
Read application data
Modify application data
+ Relevant Security Requirements

System integration testing must include security checks to protect against Multiple Interpretation Errors across systems.

+ Purposes
  • Exploitation
+ CIA Impact
Confidentiality Impact: MediumIntegrity Impact: MediumAvailability Impact: Low
+ Technical Context
Architectural Paradigms
+ Content History
CAPEC Content TeamThe MITRE Corporation2014-06-23Internal_CAPEC_Team
CAPEC Content TeamThe MITRE Corporation2017-08-04Updated Related_Attack_Patterns, Resources_RequiredInternal

More information is available — Please select a different filter.
Page Last Updated or Reviewed: August 04, 2017