An attack of this type exploits a programs' vulnerabilities in client/server communication channel authentication and data integrity. It leverages the implicit trust a server places in the client, or more importantly, that which the server believes is the client.

An attacker executes this type of attack by placing themselves in the communication channel between client and server such that communication directly to the server is possible where the server believes it is communicating only with a valid client.

There are numerous variations of this type of attack.

Web applications may use Javascript to perform client side validation, request encoding/formatting, and other security functions, which provides some usability benefits and eliminates some client-server roundtripping. However, the web server cannot assume that the requests it receives have been subject to those validations, because an attacker can use an alternate method for crafting the HTTP Request and submit data that contains poisoned values designed to spoof a user and/or get the web server to disclose information.

Web 2.0 style applications may be particularly vulnerable because they in large part rely on existing infrastructure which provides scalability without the ability to govern the clients. Attackers identify vulnerabilities that either assume the client side is responsible for some security services (without the requisite ability to ensure enforcement of these checks) and/or the lack of a hardened, default deny server configuration that allows for an attacker probing for weaknesses in unexpected ways. Client side validation, request formatting and other services may be performed, but these are strictly usability enhancements not security enhancements.

Many web applications use client side scripting like Javascript to enforce authentication, authorization, session state and other variables, but at the end of day they all make requests to the server. These client side checks may provide usability and performance gains, but they lack integrity in terms of the http request. It is possible for an attacker to post variables directly to the server without using any of the client script security checks and customize the patterns to impersonate other users or probe for more information.

Many message oriented middleware systems like MQ Series are rely on information that is passed along with the message request for making authorization decisions, for example what group or role the request should be passed. However, if the message server does not or cannot authenticate the authorization information in the request then the server's policy decisions about authorization are trivial to subvert because the client process can simply elevate privilege by passing in elevated group or role information which the messgae server accepts and acts on.

An attacker initiates a series of events designed to cause a user, program, server, or device
to perform actions which undermine the integrity of software code, device data structures, or device
firmware, achieving the modification of the target's integrity to achieve an insecure state.

An attacker uses deceptive methods to cause a user or an automated process to download and install dangerous code that originates from an attacker controlled source. There are several variations to this strategy of attack.

An attacker discovers the structure, function, and composition of an object, resource, or system
by using a variety of analysis techniques to effectively determine how the analyzed entity was constructed
or operates. The goal of reverse engineering is often to duplicate the function, or a part of the function,
of an object in order to duplicate or "back engineer" some aspect of its functioning. Reverse engineering
techniques can be applied to mechanical objects, electronic devices or components, or to software, although
the methodology and techniques involved in each type of analysis differ widely.

An attacker discovers the structure, function, and composition of a type of computer software
by using a variety of analysis techniques to effectively determine how the software functions and
operates, or if vulnerabilities or security weakness are present within the implementation. Reverse
engineering methods, as applied to software, can utilize a wide number approaches and techniques.
Methodologies for software reverse engineering fall into two broad categories, 'white box' and 'black
box.' White box techniques involve methods which can be applied to a piece of software when an executable
or some other compiled object can be directly subjected to analysis, revealing at least a portion of
its machine instructions that can be observed upon execution. 'Black Box' methods involve interacting
with the software indirectly, in the absence of the ability to measure, instrument, or analyze an
executable object directly. Such analysis typically involves interacting with the software at the
boundaries of where the software interfaces with a larger execution environment, such as
input-output vectors, libraries, or APIs.