CAPEC

Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification
Common Attack Pattern Enumeration and Classification

A Community Knowledge Resource for Building Secure Software

Home > CAPEC List > Individual CAPEC Dictionary Definition (Release 1.1)   View the CAPEC List

Individual CAPEC Dictionary Definition (Release 1.1)
Individual CAPEC Dictionary Definition (Release 1.1)

Buffer Overflow in an API Call
Attack Pattern ID
Pattern Abstraction: Detailed

8

Typical Severity

High

Description

Summary


This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An attacker who has access to an API may try to embed malicious code in the API function call and exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability in the function's implementation. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.

Attack Execution Flow

  1. 1- An attacker can call an API exposed by the target host.

  2. 2- On the probing stage, the attacker injects malicious code using the API call and observes the results. The attacker's goal is to uncover a buffer overflow vulnerability.

  3. 3- The attacker finds a buffer overflow vulnerability, crafts malicious code and injects it through an API call. The attacker can at worst execute remote code on the target host.

Attack Prerequisites

The target host exposes an API to the user.

One or more API functions exposed by the target host has a buffer overflow vulnerability.

Typical Likelihood of Exploit

High

Methods of Attack
  • API Abuse
  • Injection
Examples-Instances

Description

Attack Example: Libc in FreeBSD

A buffer overflow in the FreeBSD utility setlocale (found in the libc module) puts many programs at risk all at once.

Description

Xtlib

A buffer overflow in the Xt library of the X windowing system allows local users to execute commands with root privileges.

Attacker Skill or Knowledge Required

Low : An attacker can simply overflow a buffer by inserting a long string into an attacker-modifiable injection vector. The result can be a DoS. High : Exploiting a buffer overflow to inject malicious code into the stack of a software system or even the heap can require a higher skill level.

Solutions and Mitigations

Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.

Use secure functions not vulnerable to buffer overflow.

If you have to use dangerous functions, make sure that you do boundary checking.

Compiler-based canary mechanisms such as StackGuard, ProPolice and the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag. Unless this provides automatic bounds checking, it is not a complete solution.

Use OS-level preventative functionality. Not a complete solution.

Attack Motivation-Consequences
  • Denial of Service
  • Run Arbitrary Code
  • Information Leakage
  • Data Modification
Injection Vector

The user supplied data.

Payload

The buffer overrun by the attacker.

Activation Zone

When the function returns control to the main program, it jumps to the return address portion of the stack frame. Unfortunately that return address may have been overwritten by the overflowed buffer and the address may contain a call to a privileged command or to a malicious code.

Payload Activation Impact

The most common is remote code execution.

Related Weaknesses
CWE-IDWeakness NameWeakness Relationship Type
120Unbounded Transfer ('Classic Buffer Overflow')Targeted
119Failure to Constrain Operations within the Bounds of an Allocated Memory BufferTargeted
118Range ErrorsTargeted
74Failure to Sanitize Data into a Different Plane (aka 'Injection')Targeted
20Insufficient Input ValidationTargeted
Related Attack Patterns
IDNameRelationship TypeRelationship Description
100Overflow BuffersMore Detailed
Relevant Security Requirements

Bound checking should be performed when copying data to a buffer.

Related Security Principles
  • Reluctance to trust
  • Defense in Depth
Purpose

Penetration

CIA Impact
Confidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact
HighHighHigh
Technical Context
Architectural ParadigmFrameworkPlatformLanguage
AllAllAllAll
References

G. Hoglund and G. McGraw. Exploiting Software: How to Break Code. Addison-Wesley, February 2004.

CWE – Buffer Errors

Source
Submission(s)
SubmitterOrganizationDateComment
G. Hoglund and G. McGraw. Exploiting Software: How to Break Code. Addison-Wesley, February 2004.Cigital, Inc2007-03-01
Modification(s)
ModifierOrganizationDateComment
Eric DalciCigital, Inc2007-02-13Fleshed out content to CAPEC schema from the original descriptions in "Exploiting Software"
Sean BarnumCigital, Inc2007-03-05Review and revise
Richard StruseVOXEM, Inc2007-03-26Review and feedback leading to changes in Description
Sean BarnumCigital, Inc2007-04-13Modified pattern content according to review and feedback
 
Page Last Updated: April 18, 2008