|
|
| Home > CAPEC List > Individual CAPEC Dictionary Definition (Release 1.1) | View the CAPEC List |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Individual CAPEC Dictionary Definition (Release 1.1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attack Pattern ID | Pattern Abstraction: Detailed 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Typical Severity | High | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Description | Summary
Attack Execution Flow
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Attack Prerequisites | The application uses environment variables. An environment variable exposed to the user is vulnerable to a buffer overflow. The vulnerable environment variable uses untrusted data. Tainted data used in the environment variables is not properly validated. For instance boundary checking is not done before copying the input data to a buffer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Typical Likelihood of Exploit | High | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Methods of Attack |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Examples-Instances | Description Attack Example: Buffer Overflow in $HOME Related Vulnerability CVE-1999-0906 Description Attack Example: Buffer Overflow in TERM Related Vulnerability CVE-1999-0046 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Attacker Skill or Knowledge Required | Low : An attacker can simply overflow a buffer by inserting a long string into an attacker-modifiable injection vector. The result can be a DoS. High : Exploiting a buffer overflow to inject malicious code into the stack of a software system or even the heap can require a higher skill level. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Probing Techniques | While interacting with a system an attacker would typically investigate for environment variables that can be overwritten. The more a user knows about a system the more likely she will find a vulnerable environment variable. On a web environment, the attacker can read the client side code and search for environment variables that can be overwritten. There are tools such as Sharefuzz (http://sharefuzz.sourceforge.net/) which is an environment variable fuzzer for Unix that support loading a shared library. Attackers can use such tools to uncover a buffer overflow in an environment variable. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indicators-Warnings of Attack | If the application does bound checking, it should fail when the data source is larger than the size of the destination buffer. If the application's code is well written, that failure should triger an alert. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Obfuscation Techniques | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Solutions and Mitigations | Do not expose environment variable to the user. Do not use untrusted data in your environment variables. Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking There are tools such as Sharefuzz (http://sharefuzz.sourceforge.net/) which is an environment variable fuzzer for Unixes that support loading a shared library. You can use Sharefuzz to determine if you are exposing an environment variable vulnerable to buffer overflow. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Attack Motivation- |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Injection Vector | The user modifiable environment variable. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payload | User supplied data potentially containing malicious code. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Activation Zone | When the subroutine which uses the environment variable returns control to the main program, it jumps to the return address portion of the stack frame. Unfortunately that return address may have been overwritten by the overflowed buffer and the address may contain a call to a privileged command or to a malicious code. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payload Activation Impact | The most common is remote code execution. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Weaknesses |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Attack Patterns |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Security Principles |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Guidelines |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purpose | Penetration | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CIA Impact |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Technical Context |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| References | G. Hoglund and G. McGraw. Exploiting Software: How to Break Code. Addison-Wesley, February 2004. CWE – Buffer Errors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Source |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||